US | wetlands EPA's New Rules Allow Wetlands Trade-Offs Developers can destroy if they create others elsewhere; environmentalists dismayed By Nick McMaster Posted Mar 31, 2008 3:46 PM CDT Copied The Empire State Building is visible as a background to Jamaica Bay in New York, Thursday, June 21, 2007, with clumps of marsh grasses in the foreground. (AP Photo/Kathy Willens) The Environmental Protection Agency today issued new wetlands-protection rules with a focus on “mitigation banking”— creating marshes elsewhere in compensation for those destroyed by development, the AP reports. The EPA argues that mitigation banking ensures the most overall wetlands protection because wetlands are often irrevocably damaged by construction, rendering on-site measures to offset the loss useless. Environmentalists worry that the regulations will ultimately prove harmful, as “the cheaper it is to mitigate, the more economic it is to buy land that has wetlands on it and destroy them," said National Wildlife Federation expert. Wetlands are often crucial to local ecosystems, critics say, and creating new ones miles away is often of little benefit. Read These Next Americans have thoughts on aging. Essayist quit drinking at age 71, writes that it's never too late. Media and YouTube are reshaping language in UK classrooms. An 89-year-old nutrition expert talks about what she eats. Report an error