UPDATE
Nov 6, 2025 3:00 PM CST
The Supreme Court is allowing President Trump's administration to enforce a policy blocking transgender and nonbinary people from choosing passport markers that align with their gender identity. Thursday's decision is Trump's latest win on the high court's emergency docket, and it means his administration can enforce the policy while a lawsuit over it plays out, the AP reports. It halts a lower-court order requiring the government to keep letting people choose male, female, or X on their passport to line up with their gender identity on new or renewed passports. The court's three liberal-leaning justices dissented from the unsigned order. The State Department changed its passport rules after Trump handed down an executive order in January declaring the US would "recognize two sexes, male and female," based on birth certificates and "biological classification."
Sep 19, 2025 12:50 PM CDT
The Trump administration on Friday asked the Supreme Court to halt a judge's order allowing transgender and nonbinary people to choose the sex marker on their passports. The June court order, which followed an earlier injunction, allows transgender or nonbinary people to request a male, female, or "X" identification marker rather than being limited to the marker that matches the gender on their birth certificate, the AP reports.
The order from US District Judge Julia Kobick in Boston came after a lawsuit challenging an executive order from President Trump that required people choose "male" or "female" based on the designations on their birth certificate. The plaintiffs said some transgender people had seen their applications returned with changed designations and others were afraid to submit applications. The transgender actor Hunter Schafer said in February that her new passport had been issued with a male gender marker, even though she'd had female gender markers on her license and passport since she was a teenager.
story continues below
In a court filing, the Justice Department said, "Private citizens cannot force the government to use inaccurate sex designations on identification documents that fail to reflect the person's biological sex—especially not on identification documents that are government property and an exercise of the president's constitutional and statutory power to communicate with foreign governments." In her order, Kobick said the policy likely violated the Constitution's equal protection clause because the policy was "rooted in irrational prejudice toward transgender Americans," as Reuters puts it.
,
uBlock 
,
and
Ghostery 
)
